355

1739-A Billon Sous Marques. Vlack 18.

Currency:CAD Category:Coins & Paper Money Start Price:800.00 CAD Estimated At:2,000.00 - 2,250.00 CAD
1739-A Billon Sous Marques.  Vlack 18.
SOLD
875.00CAD+ buyer's premium (175.00)
This item SOLD at 2019 May 02 @ 19:56UTC-4 : AST/EDT

Buyer’s Premiums will be added on all items as per the Terms & Conditions of the sale. Invoices will be emailed out after The Toronto Coin Expo.

1739-A Billon Sous Marques. Vlack 18. Rarity-8, possible pattern issue? About Uncirculated, the VLACK PLATE COIN, the only example known when his book was written (one other has since been found). In his work Vlack notes “this variety must be given special attention. It has an inverted V for an A and no stop after NOM. It almost appears to be a pattern because of the sharpness in detail and perfect centering. This only known specimen is struck in copper, and while unusual, is believed to be a mint product.” In the January, 2008 Stack’s auction of the Vlack collection this exact specimen appeared as Lot 5085, complete with a box around the description to highlight its importance, and it brought $2,300, one of the highest prices in the run of 350+ Sous Marques that legendary collection contained. We note it was there graded Choice VF, likely because of some light reverse marks, but the coin is indeed an AU, and likely never circulated, with the light rub due to cabinet friction; it is easily plate matched to the Vlack book and auction by the presence of a tiny nick between the L and right fleur-de-lys on the reverse. Its status has continued to be debated. It is exceptionally well made, on a high quality copper planchet which never had any silvering – if this were a counterfeit issue, one would not expect it to be accepted in circulation when it was the wrong color and clearly copper instead of billon (the other known specimen is also on the same copper planchet). The die work is also well done, save for the mintmark, which is from the same V punch as that letter in NAV on the reverse; the engraver likely did not have an A punch on hand – the one used on NAV is the same upside-down V, with a crossbar added to make it into a proper A. It seems too well-made to be a counterfeit, and we agree with Vlack that it does appear a genuine Paris Mint product. But one wonders why a pattern would be made a year after the series started, instead of the first year – and why there was no mention of such a pattern in the literature on French numismatics in the last 250+ years. Certainly an enigma, and we agree with the Vlack auction cataloguer that “the cataloguer leaves the answer up to wiser heads than his.” Ford never owned an example, and we have found no other auction record for this extremely rare and important variety. We expect strong interest in this specimen – it is a museum-worthy coin!